How do you relate to one another publicly?

Is there an unspoken code of conduct between you and your partner for public relations purposes? A wealth of body language, carefully coded messages which pass between you like chemicals absorbed through relational osmosis? Perhaps you have agreed that there are certain things you will or will not say or do in the presence of others, and it takes but a meaningful glance, shared, to recall that agreement.

Have you ever found yourself bristling in public over something your husband said to you, or some behavior your wife exhibited that at home would either be accepted with courtesy and respect, or dealt with swiftly and unselfconsciously? Has your partner ever totally shocked you by bandying sharp retorts in the presence of others for no better reason than sheer perverse self will?

At home, I’m perfectly content to allow my husband a great deal of latitude in how he chooses to assert his dominance. Well, actually it has nothing at all to do with my allowing or not; it’s more in how I react. I respond positively when his hormones overflow, and he reaches out either physically or metaphorically to exercise his will. A well chosen turn of phrase can turn my knees to jelly and send tremors through the sub strata of self in a heartbeat. Privately. That same tone of voice or pointed suggestion in public can feel like fighting words to me. I often wonder why I find certain aspects of masculine dominance highly appealing privately, whilst those same characteristics can rankle in the presence of others.

Not long ago, we had dinner with several other couples at a favorite restaurant. The waiter moved efficiently around the table taking drink and appetizer orders, the responses ranging from Margueritas with nachos, to Martinis with marinated asparagus. Stopping half way round the table the waiter enquired what I’d be having. I was mildly surprised when my husband spoke for me saying, “Ameribrit doesn’t drink spirits. She’ll have a White Wine Spritzer.” Immediately, all eyes were upon us, the crimson in my cheeks undoubtedly looking neon bright. Embarrassed though I was, I simply smiled, reached for my darling’s hand and agreed, “That’s true. I always pay too high a price when I drink spirits.” My response was one of those coded messages which only the two of us could decipher.

The awkward moment passed, further orders were taken, and the meal was lovely. Had we been alone that evening, I would have given over to the deep seated gut reaction of fierce pleasure my husband’s pronouncement caused. In mixed company, I did everything in my power to sublimate the urge to playfully say, “Yes Sir.” I have a history of being sick if I drink hard liquor. It takes but a few sips, and my body rebels, so we’ve agreed that it’s in my best interest to avoid strong drink. The high price I pay is not only the physical illness I might suffer. More significantly, it’s the caning I’ll receive the next day for being foolish about my health. Why do I allow him to punish me? Why, I’ve asked him to do so. It’s our private, mutually enjoyable ritual on those rare occasions when I choose to live large.

So, why did I feel so deeply ashamed of my reaction to my husband taking me in hand in front of God, the neighbors and various and sundry wait staff? The dynamics of our relationship seem, to me, as private as sexual behavior. I feel no shame in what we share physically, behind closed doors, but I don’t want anyone peeking in the widow. Perhaps I feel that his making his primacy in our relationship clear to others, they are being given a glimpse of something I feel is too personal to share.

Many people who know us well have witnessed the subtle interplay between my husband and me, and one brave girlfriend actually asked a few pointed questions. Carefully wording my reply, I basically told her that I followed his lead because I like where he’s going. True. I do. I like where he’s been, where he’s headed, and particularly his vehicle for getting himself to and fro. That heady aura of dominance which women like me seem to sense. He seems to walk in a rarified atmosphere, one which is too rich and sharp for the average man. I feel it, I smell, it drives me wild. So my friend got the edited version of what transpires between us. Those of you here can probably articulate, more clearly than I, the whats and wherefores. The rest of the world just doesn’t need to know.

Nearly always, my husband politely requests, cordially invites, subtly urges. When the tides of primal manhood course through his veins, he steps close, right into my personal In Zone. Standing in his manly, commanding presence with my head tilted back to see his Nordic blue eyes, I’m barely in control of my deeply female response. Others see that, and it can be unsettling to me. I feel the exchange between us like an elemental power, electrifying, exciting, intoxicating. Sometimes, I wish there was on OFF switch I could throw, dashing out what seems like blinding natural light in a world bathed in the harshness of artificiality.

We’ve developed a shorthand of sorts, but there are still times in public when I feel the urge, or give in to the desire to push at the boundaries; test the limits. He’s unyielding. I can push, but the reassurance of his loving presence remains steadfast. Am I the only one who doesn’t want the outside world to see this exchange of power? I’d like an official code of public conduct. You can put that in caps. Of course, when I told him so, he merely smiled.

Ameribritwife

Taken In Hand Tour start | next


Have you seen the following articles?
The erotic power of the unshackled man
Why would anyone want to be controlled by a man?
What do you mean, you want to be taken in hand?!
Can you be Taken In Hand if you're not submissive?
The submission of a Taken In Hand woman
Abusive men: Hedda Nussbaum's list of red flags
Giving up control is not easy
What is the secret recipe?
Communication, consent and connection
Women want men who are more dominant

In public or in private

Either way, I wouldn't like it if my husband started telling me what I could have to drink or eat. There are limits.

Invisible dynamics

I can't speak from experience because (hankies out) I haven't had a proper Taken In Hand relationship yet. But when it happens I can't imagine wanting the dynamic between us to be visible to others at all. To let it leak out into the real world in a way only we understand - sure, I think that might be fun. But the point of that kind of game is the irony of its not being sussed.

I think my own preference actually is to treat my partner in public as my Queen - to be more respectful, more considerate, more devoted and attentive than most blokes are towards their women. If others wonder, especially other women (because I think if my partner's likely to be interested in anyone's speculation, it's theirs) what exactly she's got that makes her so treasured - all the better. She'll deserve eyebrows to be raised in that way.

Health Reasons or Not

I'd think it's embarrassing to be told what to do like a little child in public. It would be nice if he used some other way of reminding you...a tap with his foot under the table or something. Really the rest of the world doesn't need to see a husband ordering for his wife as if she can't read a menu.

"Pat"

public control

How much I drink and when are one of the first things my husband took control of when I offered him control. I'm not allowed to drink before the children go to bed at nine and also not unless I ask him first. I have been severely taken in hand on at least one occasion for breaking that rule.

The last time we were out on a date I had a lovely huge long island iced tea on an empty stomach. The food took so long and the drink was so yummy I just couldn’t help myself from overindulging. Also I love that relaxed feeling the drink gives me. When I fell asleep promptly as soon we got home from our romantic date my husband was not too happy. He told me I am no longer going to be able to order any drinks when we are out on a date because I just can't handle it. We had a romantic evening planned without the kids. It did turn out to be a romantic evening when I woke up about two hours later, but he was plenty annoyed by then. Understandably too.

I guess I wouldn't be embarrassed if he reminded me in public that I couldn't have a drink. At least not with most of our friends. If it was a work colleague or certain relatives I might not be too happy. I doubt he would do it in front of someone like that. But if I did have the drink, especially if he reminded me before we went out not to order one I would be in a great deal of trouble. I really can't imagine being that brazenly disobedient.

But most of our friends would probably think there was nothing strange about a husband telling his wife how much alcoholic beverage she was allowed to consume. Most of our friends are very “husband is head of the wife” for religious reasons and so it would seem natural to them. They would probably think I shouldn't be drinking anyway or at least shouldn’t be getting drunk or tipsy so they would agree with his requirment.

I guess I would be embarrased if I was with a really liberated woman or couple and my husband told me what I could or couldn't do. I suppose I should be braver and stick to my own values. Yet it's hard to go against the social values of the society I live in.

Different in puplic

Everybody doesn`t have the same limits. That wasn`t the question, it was only an example. And yes, I feel different about things when others are around too. But you can`t always hide the kind of relationship you`re in. Either way, friends who are vanilla usually can`t figure it out. Let them think what they want.

Get that code of conduct

ABW, you said:

I’d like an official code of public conduct. You can put that in caps. Of course, when I told him so, he merely smiled.

Why 'of course'? If you want to keep the nature of your relationship private, shouldn't you come to an agreement about what he will and won't do in public? Surely he doesn't wish to embarrass you in the way he did.

He could let you order your own drinks, since "you don't want the outside world to see this exchange of power". And if your order goes against an agreement you've made, or what he knows to be your own long-term wishes, only then should he intervene. You'll be embarrassed then, but you'll know you're to blame.

Theo
chas_dar-at-yahoo.co.uk

Tactful Reminders

Yes, one thing I find objectionable about your husband's conduct is that you hadn't even ordered yet. He had no way of knowing whether you were going to make the right or the wrong choice yet he stepped in and completely took it away from you. I would be humiliated and angry.

Being a diabetic, and trying to clean up my act after a long while of being out of control with it, I made an agreement with my husband that we will say something if we see the other making a poor food choice (he has high cholesterol and could use to slim down, so his eating is putting him at risk also).

However I would not blurt out in front of our friends, "Hey, you're not supposed to be eating that." And I would hope he would not do that to me either. A touch and a whispered, "Remember?" would work just as well and not expose anyone to public embarrassment. At the very worst if one of us insisted on ordering a sweet dessert, we could offer to share it so the damage is reduced.

"Pat"

Do you behave differently in public than in private?

The illustration I used apparently has distracted from my original question. Do you behave differently in public than in private?

I suppose I'm wondering if, in this primarily vanilla society, some of us are completely at home with our lifestyle choice, or if many of us, myself included, still feel the stigma of societal censure on relationships of the Taken In Hand variety.

In a society where an individual's sanity and emotional stability can be called into question, especially professionally, I feel quite reticent to allow the outside world that intimate glimpse of how I function on an elemental level. Not wanting to invite questions regarding competence, confidence, and general character, I tend to be supremely private regarding my Taken In Hand association with my husband.

Having a desire to yield, especially sexually, to a strong man, one who can withstand the torrents of opinion which I'm prone to unleashing; One to whom I feel equal in mental capacity, talent, character and emotional health, while remaining positively female in his very male presence, doesn't render me somehow less capable of functioning in society. As a matter of fact, I feel more capable, more fully and truly the best version of my self; due in no small part, to my self awareness within the parameters of my relationship. My desire to follow my husband’s lead doesn’t not preclude my own abilities as a leader.

Louise mentioned limits, and yes, as an anonymous reader confirmed, we all have them, though each individual’s limits are unique to that person’s needs and experiences. Louise is comfortable with her husband’s clothing choices, while I, on the other hand, would absolutely draw the line right there and damn and dare the husband who crossed it! My man would have me dressed like a 1980’s Tory Party Wanna Be. Pat apparently had the same emotional response as I to my husband overstepping an unspoken boundary in public; embarrassment, while Forty Something Wife accepts her husband’s control and his manner of manifesting it as perfectly acceptable.

As Carl so aptly remarked

To let it leak out into the real world in a way only we understand - sure, I think that might be fun. But the point of that kind of game is the irony of its not being sussed.

There is an element of very adult play in how I personally relate to my man. The dynamics are infused, absolutely saturated with sexual tension. It’s great fun to use our private code in public, as long as I have the feeling I’m leaving the whole world in the dark regarding the deeper meaning. As previously discussed on this site, there is delicious sensuality in the non sexual way Taken In Hand couples often relate to one another. That is entirely the case with my own relationship.

I did remark upon my surprise when my husband ordered for me, as he generally is completely respectful, and as Carl hopes to one day do with a partner, treats me as his queen in public. Normally, any directive I receive from my husband, even at home, is posed in a polite and courteous manner. At home, in the privacy of our own little world, I often respond to a concern on his part with a playful, “Yes Sir.” It gives both us a charge and thrill that ordinary exchanges miss.

Theo suggested I obtain that Code OF Conduct I mentioned. One of the reasons I searched for information on relationships such as my own, was to clarify and define my reality. As I mentioned in the readers forum, my husband and I have developed as a couple without ever discussing it. We naturally relate to one another in a Taken In Hand sort of way. My reading on this site is an attempt to clarify and define our relationship, mainly for my own peace of mind. My husband has no desire for rules or labels. It will be interesting to discover if the posts on this site interest him as they do me.

Again, the question is merely whether or not you and your beloved behave differently in public than you do in private. I’ve probably heaped a bundle of fluff on top of that query to further distract.

Thank you all for your interesting replies

Ameribritwife

Why be embarrassed about who

Why be embarrassed about who and what you are? I would not be embarrassed if my Master decided I needed a reminder in a public place. It is his decision and right to guide me in the right direction. He takes his responsibility seriously and from what the OP said.. it wasn't some big display of dominance.. it was a subtle statement about her not drinking spirits. Obviously a difference of opinion here.

1980s Tory wannabe

That sounds lovely! It just shows what a wise man your hubby is, Ameribritwife.

Public vs. Private

Seriously, I think every couple, Taken In Hand or not, behaves somewhat differently in public than in private. Everyone has secret codes... not just male led couples. Everyone has little in jokes that no one else would get and it would be impossible to explain without losing something in translation. I think the answer has to be an unqualified yes.

"Pat"

Clothing choices

I certainly wouldn't dress like a 1980s Tory wanabee -whatever that is - if my husband wanted me to, because I suspect it would mean wearing dresses, and I hate dresses. The way my husband would really like me to dress would be something resembling Jane Fonda in 'Barbarella', or possibly Raquel Welch in 'One Million Years B.C.' At my time of life and my size though it is simply not on. However, I do wear the kind of underwear he likes, it is extremely silly but it gives him immense pleasure, and he doesn't mind so much what's on top (usually jeans or leggins) so long as it's tight. After all, if he's willing to spank me (and spanking wasn't something he was in to at all before he met me) I don't feel it's too much for him to ask me to wear daft underwear.

Mrs Thatcher's New Line Of Clothing

Carl,

I think we'll all be safer, not to mention more stylish, if you and my husband stay with menu planning!

Thanks for the laugh!
Amerbritwife

Louise As Barbarella

Go Louise!

I've been reading through the site, and have come to the conclusion that you have a lovely sense of humor. I'm not sure which frightens me more; the thought of slipping into something scanty and furry, or the Maggie Thatcher look, circa 1982. Either way, I feel my husband has far better things to do with his valuable time than concern himself with my clothing! Actually, he seldom comments on my clothing, except to suggest I hike my skirt higher, under certain circumstances. Come to think of it, he has also voiced undergarment preferences. What is it about suspender belts and stockings that give men such pleasure?

Here's to pleasing the partners in our lives! (invisible mug raised on high)

Cheers,
Ameribritwife

Something scanty

My husband's opinion on women's clothing is basically 'less is better', emboldened by his success at choosing a swimsuit for me last year, his project for this summer is to get me into a bikini. He will probably succeed, since we started taking the children to our local leisure pool regularly, I have noticed that much fatter women than me wear them.

I try to keep a sense of humour while reading this site, when I first discovered it I thought it must be a joke "these people can not be serious" I kept muttering incredulously to myself. I was slightly appalled to find that I was strongly attracted by much of what I read, I am still somewhat surprised at myself for finding that I actually wanted to have this kind of relationship!

Public vs private

Again, I don't have much time, so I must be brief, but let me just mention a few of the many different considerations, here:

1. Does the woman have a taste for humiliation? If not, then any publicly humiliating treatment is likely to be very unwise. Dignity and respect is important to many women. For women who don't like being humiliated, Carl's approach sounds good to me.

2. Is the woman a private sort of person or a let-it-all-hang-out public sort of person? If she is a private person, she might well not enjoy having what seems such a private matter (her intimate sexual connection with her man, her sexuality, etc.) made public. Having private information made public without consent is a terrible violation, and can in some cases be unforgivable. So again, my advice to men is to tread very carefully and with sensitivity and consideration. Not every woman can function in a let-it-all-hang-out or public way. Given that Taken In Hand is not acceptable in society, it is likely that even a woman who is generally open and happy to talk about her innermost desires publicly might not feel comfortable for the neture of the relationship to be publicly viewable.

3. Public/semi-public/private: Where/what/who? It might be that in public hundreds of miles from home, in a place where you will not be recognised, the woman might enjoy displaying the nature of the relationship in a way that she certainly wouldn't if you were at home, with friends, or anywhere she might be recognised. Or it might be that she might like it when with friends but not more publicly, or she might like it when with some friends but not others. These are possibilities to discuss rather than make too many assumptions about.

4. Things can change. What might be unacceptable now might not be so next week or next year, and vise versa. Do not assume that preferences don't change. They often do.

Public, Private, Semi-private

I know that for me, public displays of that nature (ie: gentle reminder not to drink hard liquor) wouldn't overly bother me. The friends and family who would most likely hear this sort of exchange would simply chalk it up to the man being what he was born to be: the leader in the relationship. Although I'm not in a relationship, and have only been in one relationship even remotely resembling this in my life, I was raised to treat men respectfully, so actually saying "Yes, Sir," in public situations or even in front of my family would be no big deal to me. I'm not a feminist by any stretch of the imagination, and all my friends know and understand that about me so that wouldn't be a problem to me. The only time I've ever had anyone question it was when a female acquaintance who is a very liberal feminist started questioning me. I just gently asked her, "Have you ever been happy in one of your relationships?" That seemed to quiet her as she had to admit that she hadn't. I'm still looking for the right one, but I know that this is a dynamic I'm definitely looking for in my future marriage partner.

Have You Ever Been Happy

The funny thing is, your friend could have asked you exactly the same question. Why do you assume that your way of relating to men is going to bring you more happiness than hers will for her?

"Pat"

How can you tell?

If you're not in a relationship, how can you tell in advance whether yours is likely to be happier than someone else's?

Re: Pat and Louise

Pat, because my way of relating to men already does make me happier. Since I've been working on fixing my attitude myself, I've had much happier relationships. Although I haven't found "the one" yet, I know that this way works for me. As to how I knew about my friend, well, let's just say she has a habit of complaining to me about her boyfriends. Needless to say, I would not use the same approach for a total stranger. I'm assuming every adult has the right to live in any sort of relationship he or she chooses.

Louise, I said I'm not in a relationship right now. That doesn't mean I have no experience in this. I did have a relationship in which we tried to use some aspects of DD, but the relationship didn't end up working, not because of the DD but because we were just wanting different things out of life. However, I am still friends with that person, I think largely because I was respectful to him and treated him like a man and not like an unwanted naughty puppy who was invading my life. I've seen the way many women treat their husbands, and it makes me cringe. Either way, as I told Pat, I know what this is what _I_ want for my life. You and every other adult human has the right to choose whatever is right for you.

Complaining about boyfriends

She'll probably keep complaining about her boyfriends until she meets the one for her. This really has no bearing on whether she prefers an equal relationship. When she meets the right guy she'll be happy.

Until then it honestly does feel like the world is full of losers and jerks. (Men feel this way too). Take it from me, I dated for a long time after college and didn't meet my husband until I was 31. I met a few nice men but I met an awful lot of guys who were, to say the least, a disappointment. I always treated them with respect until they let me down. Then they got the benefit of my opinion of their behavior.

Having an equal relationship does not equate to treating your husband or S/O like an "unwanted naughty puppy." It seems as if you and a lot of others make that assumption. Personally I find it ill-informed and condescending. It's no more true than the statement that in every Taken In Hand relationship there is an overbearing, controlling creep of a man.

"Pat"

Re: complaining about boyfriends

A good bit of food for thought and thanks, Pat. I certainly didn't mean to imply that other relationships aren't happy. My parents were blissfully married for 40 years until my dad passed away last year, and afaik there was no "taken in hand" involved. More what I was getting at was that this is what feels right for me. As to my friend complaining about her boyfriends, well you'd have to have been there. Most of her complaints involved not bad behavior on the part of the boyfriend, but on the part of her. Of course, this was a very specific example and not meant to be generalized to everyone. I know many couples are very happy in other relationship styles. But hey.. we're all different, which is what makes it great to be human, right?

Differential Conduct

"As I mentioned in the readers forum, my husband and I have developed as a couple without ever discussing it. We naturally relate to one another in a Taken In Hand sort of way. My reading on this site is an attempt to clarify and define our relationship, mainly for my own peace of mind. My husband has no desire for rules or labels. It will be interesting to discover if the posts on this site interest him as they do me." - ameribritwife

So much of your post resonates within me. We do not behave differently in public than in private. Our relationship is like yours, partially quoted above. However, with us, it is just the way we relate. I can't even say 'relate best'. So sometimes words and even erotic gestures surface unintentionally around other people.

For example, he has cupped his hand over and into the front of my clothing and very passionately pulled me to him in very public places. He does not do this because we are visible. He does it because I am his woman and he is my man and the sheer animalistic need that plays naturally between us has risen to a level in him that overrides his carefully cultivated need to be socially acceptable in public. I take this as a compliment! It is hot that he responds to my "vibes" in this primal way. My response to him is equally primal and oblivious. I am putty in his hands! I couldn't change this if I tried.

Waitstaff often direct their questions to the women. This is true of almost all service-related businesses. We had an incident recently during which he was purchasing shoes for himself. The saleswoman consistently directed her questions to me even though he was the customer. I always redirected her attention to my man. Eventually she caught on. It is my way of modeling respect for him in a public place. I want everyone to know he is the authority of himself as well as of me. It doesn't need to be demonstrative. More often than not we are quite covert.

That said, I have complete freedom nearly all of the time. I can and do speak for myself. He only redirects me when he deems it necessary, public or private. I am happy to be under this man and I'm happy if other couples pick up on that.

Louise

I do not think Louise will be alone very much longer. Some man will find her with her "New Attitude" and snap her up.

I have been out in the singles world for a while and submissive women are a rare commodity.

Ladies, if you want to get married, dye your hair blonce with a fwe nice curls, put on a dress and start saying yes sir. You won't last two weeks until some man pounces on you.

I have thought about giving seminars on this. I see desperate women out there flailing around trying to get a man and they are dressed like they just changed the oil on their car.

If men dressed as badly as women do, we would all be wearing t-shirts with holes in them and jeans with holes in the knees.

If you don't want to submit that is fine with me. I don't think you will change a lot of minds arguing your point on this site.

I had a girlfriend and I put a collar and leash on her and took her out for a walk one night. It was the best thing I ever did.

There is no need to make a scene in a restaurant. A simple look or a whisper is all that is needed.

You women should try being submissive for a week and see what happens, you can always go back.

John

Desperate women

I have never found myself that the clothes I wear ever made much difference as to whether I attracted a man or not. When I was young, most of the men I went out with were men I met in the re-enactment society I belonged to, where I spent most of my time dressed as a man anyway. I found that some men like dresses, some men like jeans, some men don't care what you wear because they're too busy ripping it off you anyway. Many of the men I knew preferred me casually dressed to tarted up. I was never desperate to get a man in general, I was sometimes desperate to get a particular man, but I never found that clothes made that much difference one way or the other.

As for dyeing my hair, definitely not! My husband would have a fit, he's crazy about my hair and always has been. It's the colour that polite people call strawberry blonde and rude people call ginger, I used to wear it down to my waist when iw as young and it drove men (including him) crazy. Dyeing it blonde would definitely be a tactical error, and curling it, no, I don't think so.

Your belief that looks are all that matter is not, incidentally, shared by my husband. He's just returned from a trip to what he refers to as 'Silicone City' (Las Vegas). Having dragged me upstairs and ravished me after his return, he shared some profound thoughts about the nature of female attractiveness with me. "Having big tits and a great arse isn't enough" he observed "it's no good having those if you're a complete bonehead"

Saying 'yes sir' would not be a viable option in the UK. It may for all I know be considered normal for a woman to address a man as 'sir' in the US, but it would definitely cause raised eyebrows in Surrey.

Being submissive because you like it is one thing, doing it because you are desperate to get a man is just pathetic. My advice to any woman desperate to get a man would be, forget about 'getting' someone, and try to get some other interests in your life, men are more likely to be interested in you if you are interested in something other than them.

private vs public

We tend to be rather private as far as strangers go, regarding our power exchange relationship. However, in the home, our teenage son is aware.

Just today, I responded to my husband about something in a way he did not like, and so he said, "Would you like to take a trip upstairs?" Our son chuckled which watching TV and said, "Forget it, she likes that."

BlueRose...

How did you respond to your son's comment?

Is he aware of your Taken In Hand relationship? does your husband spank you without worrying what your son/neighbours might hear or think?

I'm curious as my husband certainly wouldn't respond to me that way, even if we're at home and the kids are around. He's very private and not one to assert his authority verbally or physically, especially if there is someone in the house.

Sounds like fun to me though....

Grace :-)

Teenagers just figure things out

I know my 17 year old son knows something is going on, even though we have tried to keep it from all of the kids. I don't think any of our younger children have any idea. Teenagers just pick up on things you don't expect them to figure out.

The reason I know he knows something is, a couple of days ago I said I was thinking about getting a tattoo. He said, "Will you be getting a tattoo of a paddle on your butt?" I just laughed and said, "Ha Ha, that's funny, but NO!" I have no idea where he got such an idea, but he seems to know something.

In Public or In Private

It doesn't matter where we are, from time to time I need to see his wonderful dominance in public settings. The very fact that he cares enough about me to give me direction (in a setting where I have made very obvious mistakes in the past) gives me such a sense of pride. He cares enough abuot me not to care what others may think. It takes a lot of work to trust your man as deeply and openly in public as you do at home. I guess that's the difference in making this a way of life and just role playing in the bedroom.

Role playing

I personally would be very embarrassed if my husband told me off or something in public. it does not mean we are 'role playing', since I do take my husband's authority seriously outside of the bedroom, it simply means I don't want to be embarrassed in public. There's a difference between taking something seriously and wanting it made an exhibition of. Wanting something to be private does not make it 'role playing'.

If we are in a public place and I have said or done something that my husband disapproves of, he can make it known to me with a quiet remark like "we'll talk about this later" (and I know perfectly well what he means by "talk") or sometimes just a glance is enough. We don't have to advertise it.

The Relationship in Public

I think we all relate differently in public than in private. That said, I feel most comfortable with treating each other with respect and love in both public and private, they just mean something different in public than they do in private. A man treating his wife like a queen sounds appropriate (although I've never seen how Prince Phil treats Bess ;), and a wife treating her husband like a king is equally appropriate.

In the U.S., it is not uncommon for the man to order for the woman in restaurants, but I always check with my wife as to her desires before doing that. I've found that commenting on what she eats is unproductive.

I am also not a feminist

Jodima, I am also not a feminist, and I find very few people who would say the same thing. I would love to have an email dialog about the reasons you chose not to embrace feminism - and why I chose not to do so. Let me know if you would be up for that.

Sharon

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.