Ever-deepening total love

I first found Taken In Hand last Autumn, and after a longer search realised that at last I had found a site that dealt with the complexities of male/female love in an adult way – and not in an ‘adult’, in-your-face, “See some porn pictures? Only $2.95 for three days!” way.

How was it that I was searching anyway? We need to go back to 1968. I was already a rapidly rising senior physician and needed a new secretary. Like many of us in the 1960s and certainly if one worked closely with armies of beautiful girls (young female doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, secretaries and so on) lots of sex and also a great deal of tender love were there for the asking.

I own up, I had been there, had multiple affairs, loved many women and, maybe, broken lots of hearts.

Then, when I was 28, this young, totally unaffected, gorgeous eighteen-year-old, fresh out of secretarial college came for an interview and took the job on offer. After a while I dropped my existing girlfriend and started to show an interest in, I will call her, M.

M, as she told me years later, was so pleased that her boss had begun to notice her. At first I occasionally took her to lunch to get to know her better, and eventually started dating her. She introduced me to serious hiking and mountain walking (something that over the years has grown and grown – eventually our children were walking long distances with their own walking boots at about three or four – M and I have trekked in the Himalayas, in the Catalan Pyrenees, in the Bavarian Alps and pretty well anywhere a good set of legs can carry a human). How I loved this girl ten years younger than I. She remained a virgin until we married in church just after her 20th birthday – and a lump still comes to my throat over 33 years after our wedding with the memory of this glorious girl/woman, with her golden hair crafted on to the top of her head, walking down the aisle towards me.

This was really a marriage made in heaven. I had suggested to her perhaps six months after she became my secretary that she was wasted doing that job, and how about college and a degree? So when we married I had not only gorgeous young wife I also had an undergraduate at that. Fortunately she was able to live at home while working for her degree.

Eventually, we wanted children. The first two pregnancies ended in miscarriages. Though as a doctor I had seen many miscarriages, I had never seen and felt the unbelievable loss that we both went through each time. Time passed and we healed and our first son, who bears one of my pen names, was born. He bears the same genes as my great aunt who died of cholera in WW1 while my grandfather, an ordinary London East-end Cockney, was fighting at the front – driving ammunition wagons. My grandfather, as a common soldier, was not allowed home for the death of his beloved ‘Rosie’ and as an old man in the 1960s I remember him still treasuring a lock of hair taken from her dead head... gorgeously auburn-red hair just like that of our first son, now 28 and a rising star in the production of historical television programmes.

Son number two, now 26 and down from university, is engaged to the most loving girl he could ever have found, a Spanish lawyer, who came to England to learn our brand of the mother tongue.

When M was bringing up the children she wanted to stay at home and did until the younger was about 11. During this time she set up and ran a highly successful and novel food business. This she sold when she wanted to take up her profession again.

M has always been successful, whatever she has done – whether bringing up children, loving her garden, walking, cycling, camping, her profession. This young beauty is now 53 and, as I said in an earlier posting, passes easily for a 35 year old (no surgery, no fancy make-up, just my M).

Fast forwarding over the years... As I said in my previous article, after erotic ‘sex slave’ games, and after she had read The Surrendered Wife, by Laura Doyle, M asked to become my slave. We had always had a totally equal relationship and we had loved our sex-life and had a huge range in our glorious fantasy sex-life, so the sex-slave game was nothing new. Asking to be my slave was.

Of course I accepted but said we should explore it slowly, first as a game. It very soon became obvious that this was not a game but something very real. something for every hour of every day. Something, I suspect, that I had never noticed before... that this highly intelligent, beautiful woman, whom I adored and worshipped and in many ways had always been in awe of, actually had been wanting to submit totally to her man.

I searched the web... the submissive sites, the BDSM sites, the D/s sites and on and on, but I could not find what M was. Of course she was and wanted to be and is my total slave. Except in public, she is not now known by her Christian name; she has her own name that she herself chose, and which I will not repeat here because it is her private name with me. Similarly my own Christian name, which is not actually Ben or Nathan, is not used between us; she calls me her master.

Since M became my slave, our learning curve has been like an F16 going skywards, climbing exceedingly fast. Clotos, as she appears on this site (and Clotos is another of her names with a special meaning to us) and I made a contract about our new relationship and it has grown and grown; it deepens daily. Neither of us could have ever have believed that a 53 year old woman and a 63 year old man could love like we do.

A love and an ownership of each other that just goes on deepening. Though legally still my wife, Clotos (who is perfectly sane and as normal as a human could ever be) is no longer my wife, except for ceremonial reasons, and I am not her husband: at her wish I am her master.

Not only is she my total slave and I her total master, I am her total slave and she my total mistress. I care for everything about her... her health, the shopping, cooking, washing, ironing, and all the bills. In her own right she is financially quite wealthy but she now owns nothing. I give her a generous allowance which she may do what she wants with but I am trusted with absolutely everything else to look after.

It is about total trust and total love.

It is about understanding the paradox of the totally owned, yet totally free, slave who loves her owner and master and in turn owns and has enslaved him and is his mistress (something we have discovered together progressively since the early part of 2002).

Why have multiple lovers and lots of different sex games when you are with the person who knows all those different lovers within herself and within her partner and also all the games (and yet more), after years of being together? Anyone who needs help might try the books by Nancy Friday.

Perhaps the closest model of our love is still that which we repeated in our marriage vows in 1970. Although we did not use the word ‘obey’, Clotos knows now that she will only gain the deeper and deeper insights of our gorgeous better love if she follows three simple rules in regard to her enslavement to me: care, love, and obedience, rules which I follow in my enslavement to her.

If you want to call this TPE, fine, D/s, fine, BDSM, fine... but it just doesn't seem to be any of that. What we have is ours and I can only hope that anyone reading this will not just laugh and think, ‘What a couple of nutters’ but instead, will try risking such an exploration in their own life. Why not try, as Clotos very bravely did, giving yourself, totally, with no holding back – and it takes time and many setbacks – to your lover. If you too offer yourself to be owned and enslaved, you might find, as Clotos has, that your shackles do not become tighter. You might find that, surprisingly, they disappear altogether.

Ben Nathan

Taken In Hand Tour start | next


Have you seen the following articles?
The alpha male and masculine power
Help! The one I love nowadays rarely wants sex!
Can you be Taken In Hand if you're not submissive?
The erotic power of real control
William Godwin: Familiarity breeds contempt
The Surrendered Wife, by Laura Doyle: a critique
Knights earn the name
White hot intensity and boundless joy
Ownership as bonding
She wants to be taken in hand against her will?!

Wow....

When I read the introduction (which mentions slavery),

I was somewhat annoyed (slavery is not my thing). However, J told me "not to go off the deep end, just READ the article first"! Having done, so, I am glad she pursuaded me to.

I understand that the choice of lifestyle was made by both of you, and this is what makes M happy, so more power to you. I think it wonderful that you are both so happy after so many years of marriage, and that feeling of bliss seems to shine through your narrative.

I wish you both the best, and I hope things go well for you.

(And next time I will read articles before I make any comments to J :-))

Random

The Surrendered Wife, by Laura Doyle: a critique

Although our level of intimacy is similar and length of marriage is analogous to that described by Ben, my wife knew before we married that she needed a man to take her in hand.

Ben's reference to Laura Doyle's The Surrendered Wife caught my attention because closet feminists sometimes claim Doyle's surrendered wife to never be in need of spanking - a subject which Doyle conveniently avoids.

Moreover, I find Doyle's version of the surrendered wife is disingenuous on its face. According to Doyle's cult classic, the surrendered wife need not tell her husband that she has surrendered her will to his. Although Doyle offers many genuinely good ideas, this lack of openness allows the woman to retain power - power that she can withdraw at anytime. Thus, Doyle’s surrendered wife is free to manipulate him in a new dimension.

Even ignoring the above, an equally troublesome issue emerges. Central to Doyle's concept is the belief that if the woman surrenders, the man will as well. It is as if Doyle believes that the invisible hand of mutual surrender will always keep the marriage upright. Marriages are seldom as neat and clean as Doyle portrays them. Those that are, all too often degenerate into roommate relationships.

The difference between Doyle's surrendered wife and the submissive wife is that the latter accepts her husband's natural inclination to take charge - even if it is over her objections. In this regard, she puts everything on the table - including the fact that she surrenders her will to his.

It follows then that her willingness to take a spanking is symbolic of the woman's new attitude. She realizes that spanking is as much about acceptance and security as it is about power.

When a woman is willing to truly surrender, a curious reversal occurs. What was once an inconvenient ritual to be endured as a child becomes a liberating experience. That which was once an article of faith in an angry politically correct diatribe is now little more than a stumbling block to intimacy.

Despite the objections above, Doyle's book is worth reading.

Noone - Your Comment

Hi Noone!

You said: "closet feminists sometimes claim Doyle's surrendered wife to never be in need of spanking - a subject which Doyle conveniently avoids. According to Doyle's cult classic, the surrendered wife need not tell her husband that she has surrendered her will to his. Although Doyle offers many genuinely good ideas, this lack of openness allows the woman to retain power - power that she can withdraw at anytime. Thus, Doyle’s surrendered wife is free to manipulate him in a new dimension."

Hey, that's a good point! And I hadn't heard before that the discipline issue has been brought up to Doyle, who sidesteps it. LOL!

Well, at least she isn't trashing it.

I read this book years ago and decided not to follow her advice to not to tell my husband I was reading it. I tell my husband everything; it felt wrong not to include him in my process. Also, he enjoyed me reading some parts to him.

Like you, I found the book well worth reading, especially for women who are scared to death to even admit to themselves this might be what they are looking for.

Amber

I read it too.

The cover of the book is deceiving. I was also a member of an online discussion group about the book. The women in the group struggle with the most simple concepts of submission that we here may take for granted.

I felt bad for them, I really wanted to direct them here but my common sense told me not to.

I would like to know who brought the issue of spanking to the author. I would love to read what they said.

ash

surrendering

I did not get the impression from Noone's article that the issue of discipline or spanking had been brought up explicity to Laura Doyle and that she had evaded it. She simply doesn't address the issue in her book. Maybe she thinks that if surrendering is the woman's idea, she doesn't need to be spanked into it. Which is true, of course. It's when we don't want to surrender or submit that we tend to get spanked. And this happens because we've communicated our surrender to our mates beforehand. I agree that keeping it a secret is a way of retaining power. If it's a secret, you don't have to submit when you don't feel like it.

Melanie

I read this book a year or so...

I read this book a year or so ago and so my memory may serve me innacurately but what I recall as my lasting impression was that actually Doyle remains the control freak, she just deals with it in a new way.

BTW, I couldn't keep it quiet that I was reading it as it was my husband who bought it for me!

Surrendering and Submitting

I believe there is an overlap in the two. It was my search for information on DD that led me to surrendering in the first place. I recommend surrendering as a good starting point for the more reluctant wives. Once they realize that trusting the man's judgment through the smaller concepts presented in the book reaps great benefits they will feel more comfortable with a higher and possibly more genuine level of submission.(surrendering reads as being a little contrived and even feels that way at first)

I know many women who are comfortable at that surrendering stage and wish to hear nothing of submission and spankings and anything else. That's ok though because at least they are acknowledging and also celebrating the man's capabilities and creating harmony in their lives. This harmony and celebration of men is good as it will possibly resonate further and make society more accepting of the male dominated HH again. Personally, I still practice the concepts of surrendering.(in truth probably more so than actual total submission)

Peace,
Daisy

There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it.--Edith Wharton

How to be an idiot

I'd been toying for a while with the idea of reading one of these soppy self-help books, to find out whether any of them could possibly have any relevance to me. First I thought of having a go at one called 'Fascinating Women' or something, but just reading the reviews on amazon made me feel nauseous, so in tyhe end I decided to have a go at this one. Well, i knew as soon as I started reading it that it wasn't going to work. For a start, Laura Doyle keeps going on about wives being critical and nagging etc, whereas in our marriage it's generally been my husband who's been the critical, nagging one. He's the one who complains about the way I load the washing-up machine, not the other way around. Ever seen The Odd Couple? Well, he's Jack Lemmon and I'm Walter Matthau. She gives the rather dubious example of Fred Astaire always leading Ginger Rogers on the dance floor, ignoring the fact that OFF the dance floor Ginger generally had a mind of he own, something that is anathema to Doyle. I lasted until page 35, which is where she gives the infamous piece of advice that if your husband takes a wrong turning off the freeway you shouldn't tell him, but just let him keep going the wrong way. I had to know. I just had to. I asked my husband if he would like it if I did that. He looked at me incredulously. "Of course not" he said "I'd be livid. Why would I want my time wasted like that?" I showed him the book, and he looked at me strangely. "There are limits, you know" he said. And suddenly the Universe made sense again. Some men might prefer their wives to behave like drivelling idiots, but my husband, I'm thankful to say, isn't one of them. And then I wondered why on earth I was wasting my time reading this load of ****ing s*** when I could be reading the new Jasper Fforde. I consigned this book to the rubbish bin, which is where it belongs. Many of my opinions have been modified, some drastically so, since I first discovered this site, but I am happy to say that this one remains unaltered. Self-Help books are RUBBISH, you'd be better off reading ANYTHING rather than one of these idiotic books. One of the amazon reviewers of Fascinating Women made what I thought was an interesting point, there are masses of books for women about how to please their husbands, make them happy etc, but a dearth of books for men about how to make their wives happy, please women etc. Is this because men just don't give a damn, or is it because they realise that idiotic books like this are just a waste of space? Louise C

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.