I say castrate weak males!

I get tired of all the patient 'belles of the balls' and I get tired most of all of these weak 'men' (victims of fear and gluttony, who are fond of sporting plastic feathers and enamored of plastic whistles not to mention cheap pieces of paper).

I say that it is my duty to castrate the weak males and that I can be what a good Taken In Hand woman really is, and that is a teacher. And I can serve as the royal castrator since I am the Empress. A good woman is a fire dancer and she teaches her man the ardent joys of the flesh through power and honor.

While we have achieved legal liberty we must remember what we are and what we are capable of. We must remember what we were as women and we must put aside the comical caricatures of the servant gathering wheat while the ape man clubs her over the head and drags her to the cave as she shivers with delight relieved that someone will protect her or she and her children will die. Now she feels safe even though she has chronic migraines. He-man will squirt out an alpha male and we will have a race that we now call human. Hysterical.

We women were never this and the historical rendering and misrepresentation of facts reminds me of when they reconstructed the dinosaur at the museum that had his toe attached to his nose for 50 years before anyone realized it was an error.

The lexicon of Taken In Hand women is vast and fertile. To be a Taken In Hand woman is to be a sin eater, a snake, a predator that opens her mouth wide inspiring great terror while she meticulously devours her man as she undulates and digests his sins whole. A Taken In Hand women is a foreboding woman.

A great warrior will allow himself to be fearlessly eaten in this way, and when he is inside his queen he will know the succor of his own surrender while he is boldly enfolded in a compassion that is so vast it is capable of drinking from his fountains of terror and pain, delivering him to a level of intimacy that ensures him of her unmatched bravery and fealty: she has been brave enough to trace the path of his soul into his journeys through heaven and through hell. Within her he will rest with might. She will gain the knowledge of his path of power and it will become hers and in this way, she as a woman is a multiple of daunting power.

Once can turn the notch on the control dial and in the right time and place on this planet earth it is possible that a Taken In Hand woman at the movement of her complete surrender will become what no one here has metionioned; not a docile little sprite but feral, aggressive, ruthless, a brutal mentor of the wrath.

A great man can command her so deeply that he can rearrange her chemistry and create an iron maiden of war. If he is a master at this art he will create a vessel that is untamable, a vessel that will be obeyed by an army, a goddess of terrible might. He will give her the breath of fire and men will tremble and quake when they witness the might of a woman who has become a vessel of war through the bonds of ecstasy and love. The woman that surrenders to an impeccable warrior becomes a ship that can navigate dark and unknown waters with her complex and symphonic ability to synchronize. She will carry him to unchartered ground and she will pioneer the new lands and it will be her flesh that is the amour or many.

A Taken In Hand woman is like a blade of grass that bends during a hurricane. She is elastic and when the wind calms she alone stands with emerald blade, a scythe, and the scythe of justice, a sharp blade of humility that shears weak hubris and sculpts a majestic topiary in her commandment of paradise.

Surrendering to a weak man will make him weaker. It will get you hot and it will get you off and that might be what you want. You may want to live in the virtual world the digital world of warlords and masters that can be purchased at the computer store.

What if the real war knocks on the door? What if death comes knocking? Will you look in the eye of dust and ashes? Who will be brave enough to endure the mirror of frailty? .

On this site I have read literature that far surpasses the feminist literature available. A great book is a book of motion and here we have a book of motion and one vision with many pens however this error of encouraging dominance with a prophylactic but subverting the path a man must take to dominance is as dangerous as allowing doctors to practice without a license.

To many this gentle encouragement seems to be the only plausible and kind path but many in our time have died from 'kindness'.

I believe that this is practiced because there is no longer a belief in the existence of angels and superheroes. It is a modern world of the banal and men at this point in time have no venue and no path of honor. There privilege is their enemy. The greater privilege that is not announced by the propaganda machine is the privilege of being born in a time and place of travail. From this travail once can become free.

The first man that loved my flesh was an archangel. While I was born in travail and terror I have been lucky enough to know super souls. The super souls were forged and backed in a hard clay of humility and I am one of the truly privileged to have known so many of them.

My sweetest love gave me sanctuary under his wings of white resplendent light. He was a middle child of a large family. Their eldest daughter, his sister was born sick. While they already endured the simplicity of poverty, keeping this girl alive manacled their fortunes to a great degree. They struggled so that she should survive and when she turned 18 she was shot down in the street like a common dog.

This could have destroyed this family but instead it turned them into angels and it turned my beloved into an archangel.

Brutal rape (not date rape) was an epidemic and the women suffered horrifically in our neighborhood. My beloved archangel became the neighborhood vigilantly and he became a very young man of power and he became a man who delivered peace.

One common man delivered peace to the warring gangs and stayed the rapists and thugs that were the common residents. He was known and commanded respected from every rogue, even from opposing gangs and this respect was won with his flesh in battle. He never sought battles but he vowed that no woman should be harmed in his neighborhood. This vow was carved deep in his heart and nothing would thwart what he believed was his mission. I believe he was a super soul.

I sometimes think of silly chickens like Camille Paglia and their childish rhetoric and I see my sweet archangel standing guard humbly and silently and I know that if the vainglorious clown walked into the neighborhood my sweet archangel would give her passage and pay the price with his flesh.

And she would laugh and mock him for he was less than a pig farmer. He had never slept in a bed his entire life. She could have mocked him day and night and he would not have been perturbed nor swayed, for he knew what he was and what he was meant to do and because he knew this he knew deep joy.

I told him that he should find a way to receive credit for his deeds and money as well. That day he looked at me as if I were insane! Credit? My suggestions were a profanity to him.

I was far worse off than his family so when it was Christmas these good people invited me to their shanty and they gave me the same gift they gave all their children. It was a sum of money that was ridiculously large for these people. I was illuminated. I worshiped my archangel and I revered him and adored him and I will continue to do so until the end of my days.

As time past my destiny caught up with us. There was no escaping the darkness ahead for me. I knew my archangel would lay down his life for me so I went on without him. I defended him with this act and I spared him. He could not have helped me and I knew I had to journey alone.

In the belly of hell I met great men of war who were monsters and heroes and who trained me in the extreme arts of war.

When I meet weak men (weakness = vanity, hubris and fear) it is my duty to emasculate them in honor of my sweet loves, and if they are tacky enough to impose themselves and unaware to such an extent that they step into their own noose, I am obliged to asphyxiate them with their own desires and I let them taste the terror and the beauty that I have eaten and that was both mine and that of my loves and it is the complete ecstasy and freedom that I have known which cause these pitiful souls to soil themselves.

The chain appears easier then the freedom of solidarity, and might is so alien that it represents terror. To encourage males to lead when they won no metals of honor is to enable them to be prisoners of an ego that is out of order and it is this ego, my friends that has kept humanity and women as chattel.

The Empress

Taken In Hand Tour start | next


Have you seen the following articles?
Why you shouldn't mention the ‘M’ word
Mistakes made in forming relationships
Is he driving you mad?
Make each other feel the luckiest person alive!
Is she afraid of losing control? Topping from the bottom?
Give me intensity or give me death!
How do you maintain control in little ways?
The paradox of the master and the queen
Taken In Hand relationships are hot and close
Out of control, insane, driven by our emotions? No way!

Applause

Empress, what deep, splendid writing. Tell us when your book hits the stores. Very well done.

Some men aren't dominant and

Some men aren't dominant and want a woman who will be in control. Some people are sexually dominant but not their private lives and vice versa. I don't think you can generalise.

Women have always had power. Women are people as competent as men at most things that matter. For a brief period a mere blip in most cultures over the last 5000 years or so men have had a little ascendancy but in terms of history it's neither here nor there and is passing, thank goodness as they've made a pretty big mess of the planet whilst they had a bit of power over it.

I wouldn't agree if you were suggesting it is that women should choose to be power behind their men as power behind the throne. Give me Indira Ghandi's and Thatchers any day rather than US presidents' wives and Cherie Blairs.

His strength may depend on her strength

A Taken In Hand woman is taken in hand by her man, so in a state she found him being her hero. No men eating creature is taken in hand, she may be seeking for one but is not in any.

But I see that you also mean that we should not surrender to weak men.

Maybe a man can be strengthened by his surrendered woman, it may depend on her strength.

But I also understand that we may create an illusion.

Hali

Narcissist preying on narcissists?

nar*cis*sism: noun. 2)Psychoanalysis. erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/narcissism

I've never quite understood the military analogy and references to warriors (and by extension their code) when referring to Taken In Hand, etc. It is my peresonal observation that perceptions of the type of discipline associated with warriors and the warrior code, when relating to the these relationships, is not consonant with the true type and level of discipline required of and achieved by a true warrior. The article above hints at that very misperception.

I believe a more fitting analogy would be horse training. The horse is a powerful animal that is naturally afraid in an unfamiliar environment. Although the natural instict is flight, a horse will turn on you and can kill you if it feels trapped or attacked.

A competent trainer knows that:

1) acting and responding justly is the foundation of the relationship;

2) pressure must be applied continuously and consistently to promote the proper response to commands, increasing as appropriate but releasing immediately once the objective is achieved;

3) training is geared toward edification and improvement;

4) the trainer assures the horse through his/her actions that the trainer is perceptive and responsive to the horse's needs and conditions (i.e., compassion); and,

5) the trainer must instill enough of a sense of admiration and trust from the animal for it to be able to overcome its own insticts when commands are given.

For the true warrior, training in the "extreme arts of war" is little more than achieving that level of self-discipline required to overcome fear in a hostile or unfamiliar environment and to channel that energy to effect the desired outcome.

Feeling it a duty to emasculate men who meet a subjective standard of weakness seems to me to be little more than an expression of narcissism. A true warrior cannot afford to be narcissitic. The pleasure is only in successfully completing the mission as skillfully as possible -- not in killing or destroying.

In my opinion, it is better for the "warrior" aspect not to be seen or heard at all -- to be completely clandestine and innocuous, until the moment arrives for it to be asserted toward completing the higher goal.

I feel that his higher goal is the edification of his woman toward her spiritual and intellectual completion, through instilling trust, acting justly and applying only that pressure required to achieve the result, and providing for his own edification by exercising his compassion through heightened perceptability of her needs and conditions.

TR

Edification

Well, frankly I am not at all enamoured of being compared to a horse or my husband to a horse trainer. I don't need my husband to edify me towards my spiritual and intellectual completion, any spiritual and intellectual completion is mine to achieve, not my husband's. Taken In Hand is a way for us to get along better together and be closer and happier, but spiritual and intellectual completion - no, I don't think so.

I find the Empress's writings immensely exciting and fascinating. Admittedly I don't understand everything she writes, but then there's a lot of stuff I don't understand on here, and the Empress is always interesting.

Louise

'Unity is Plural and at Minimum Two'

I don’t know where you live but where I live a millionaire is barely above a pauper unless they have a rent-stabilized apartment. Do you really think that there aren’t many people, relatively speaking, that have lived in recent history and have survived incredible ordeals and then have gone on to become wealthy and have made it a mission to give back and feel a sense of duty to do so. There must be hundreds of thousands of people like me. Do you really find it incredible? Here is something I find incredible. Between the years 1958-1960 Chairman Mao in his “Great Leap Forward” caused the starvation of 38 million people in 3 years. Do you want to know what is more incredible? There are still people wandering around extolling the virtues of Chairman Mao. A tai chi master told someone I know how much he revered Chairman Mao last week.

I think there is much to be said in the sciences about this type of relationship that have not been said here. Fuller is one of my favorites and Synergetics makes a relevant statement to taken in hand:

“Unity is plural and at minimum two’

I believe this was in Synergetics subtitled Geometry of Thinking. I think volumes could be said about the geometry of taken in hand. From Fuller I have resolved for myself the mystery of the taken in hand relationship under the subtext of ‘unity is plural and at minimum 2’.

Then there is the idea of inside/ouside. Fuller says the outside of a thing can never be the inside of a thing. (I know this is a vulgar paraphrasing.) Think about an orange and how it has an outside. You may believe that if you slice the outside you would ‘see’ the inside. Not true -- and this is not my idea but you can look it up. (Synergetics is online and has a huge following.) Once you slice the orange you have breached the system and you now have 2 outsides. You will never ‘see’ inside.

I think this is relevant to taken in hand relationships because it is the perfect example of inside/outside. What is inside the mysterious orb of a relanship between 2 lovers can never be taken ‘outside’ If you take the inside outside then you are creating a mandate that is dangerous to society. Punishment and obedience is a sublime thing between 2 parties but if these rules were applied to society you would have the historical horrors that have already occurred. This is why it is critical to understand the inside/outside concept. Physics is about motion and, analogously, the relationship between two people is about motion and the instinct that drives the taken in hand relationship is an instinct for motion. It is a fascinating geometry. And oh what exquisite motion!

And one could take it further to explain the need for punishments to be ‘real’ of course they are ‘real’ within the sublime homunculus of a relationship within the orb or the ‘orange’.

Punishment spanking is real because there needs to be definitions between the parties involved. One can define its existence only by reference to an ‘other’.

A dominant submissive relationship could be defined as a Boolean relationship and it is a delicious sequence that really is an argument for equality. I find it fascinating but I bet I am the only one.

Most of you will never hear anything like this again. It is not because it doesn’t exist but because many will not come forward and stand before you as I have. They will hide because they have suffered greatly and do not want to suffer again by your ignorance. Don’t blame the feminists for the suffering of women, blame yourselves: Your hands are covered in blood.

Who will be brave enough to endure the mirror of fraility?

Evidently not the individual who preaches castration of the weak (weak males included). Clearly, it is the writer's own weakness that he/she despises and fears; and consequently must destroy and kill in others.

A brave "warrior" acknowledges her/his human fraility and fortifies it. A wise "leader" sobers her/his strength with reason and compassion- an antitdote to the reckless short-lived power of drunken arrogance, brazeness, and illusions of invincibility.

Lastly, striving for intellectual and spiritual completion is a personal endeavor AND an interpersonal and collective one. No human being successfully evolves in a social vaccum (as proven by an abundance of social experiments designed to test the theory).

Your hands are covered in blood

I think your hands are covered in blood, Empress. I may sympathize with your ordeal whatever it is, but I cannot consent with your hatred.

As an example, your post made me to attack my husband for pettiness, what I regret. Certainly the whole incident made me stronger in a sense that I realize better what I really appreciate. But such incidents are harmful.

I strongly believe that dissemination of hatred is evil.

Hali

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.