|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
However, that name may have been an error for Tliliuhqui-Tepec, which was another of Tenochtitlan's xochiyaoyotl rivals and would have been a logical joint target with Tlaxcallan in such a war. On the data available the issue cannot be resolved, so I will accept the documents at face value, but I do so tentatively. If that interpretation is correct, the recorded conquest of Tepeyacac may have occurred later during the same campaign (Chimalpahin 1965:121 [relación 3]). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73. Durán 1967, 2:46062 [chap. 61]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:60, 67; Berlin and Barlow 1980:1718; Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3]; Clark 1938, 1:41; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75. Davies 1968:137. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76. Chimalpahin 1965:233 [relación 7]; Códice Vaticano 196465:284; Crónica mexicana 1975:63840 [chap. 97]; Durán 1967, 2:45455 [chap. 60]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:6163; Berlin and Barlow 1980:61; Códice Telleriano-Remensis 196465:312; Crónica mexicana 1975:660 [chap. 101]; Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:192 [chap. 75]; Torquemada 197583, 1:312 [bk. 2, chap. 87]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:67; Chimalpahin 1965:121 [relación 3]; Clark 1938, 1:41, 58; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79. Durán 1967, 2:462 [chap. 62]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80. Durán 1967, 2:46466 [chap. 62]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81. Cortés 1971:70 [letter 2]; Díaz del Castillo 190816, 2:7 [bk. 5, chap. 83]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82. Torquemada 197583, 1:312 [bk. 2, chap. 87]. Several towns are listed as conquests that present difficulties in interpretation. Acalhuacan is listed as referring to Tetzcoco by Kelly and Palerm (1952:313), but a town of that name, an estancia of Ecatepec (Gibson 1964:74), was a subject of Tlatelolco. Also, Coatitlan was also an estancia of Ecatepec (Gibson 1964:74). Thus their interpretations as corruptions of Acolhuacan and Cuauhtitlan are questionable. Chizquiyauhco (Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3]) may be Chiconquiauhco (Holt 1979:290). Tetenanco may signify Teotenanco. Teconpatlan may be Tecpatlan. Chimalpahin (1965:229 [relación 7]) lists Tecozauhtepecas, which is probably an error for Tecozauhtecs, which yields Tecozauhtlan, which is supported by Clark (1938, 1:41). Totollan (Chimal-pahin 1965:228 [relación 7]) was an area around Piaztlan (Gerhard 1972:42). Tlanitztlan is in present-day Oaxaca near Tototepec and Sola de Vega (Kelly and Palerm 1952:316n.7). I have been unable to locate the remaining towns (Acolnahuac, Huixachtitlan, Mazatzintlan in Chichimec territory, and Zacuantepec). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83. Clark 1938, 1:58; Crónica mexicana 1975:623 [chap. 94]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84. Colección de documentos inéditos ... de ultramar 18851932, 11:364; 13:22122. Scholes and Roys (1968:3435), however, interpret the Aztec presence there as reflecting an Aztec merchant community, but they do so on the basis of Sahagún's account of events in the region, an account that is graphic in detail but all too inadequate in its breadth of events. |
|
|
|
|
|