|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
59. Torquemada 197583, 1:29596 [bk. 2, chap. 79]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60. The Anales de Cuauhtitlan (1975:61) lists Quimichtlan, but in a context that would place it in this region, and the citation more properly refers to Quimichtepec. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61. The probable route ran directly to Tlachquiauhco and then to Alotepec; doubled back through Quimichtepec, Nopallan, and the Yopitzinca area; and returned to the basin of Mexico (Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:61; Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3], 232 [relación 7]; Códice Telleriano-Remensis 196465:31012; Códice Vaticano 196465:28082; Dibble 1981, 1:41; Mengin 1952:458; Torquemada 197583,1:295 [bk. 2, chap. 79]). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62. Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3], 233 [relación 7]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63. Chimalpahin 1965:232 [relación 7]; Torquemada 197983, 1:293 [bk. 2 chap. 78]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64. Torquemada 197583, 1:296 [bk. 2, chap. 79]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:67; Berlin and Barlow 1980:18; Chimalpahin 1965:229 [relación 7]; Clark 1938, 1:41, 58; Crónica mexicana 1975:599 [chap. 88]; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119; Sahagún 1954:3; Torquemada 197583, 1:296 [bk. 2, chap. 79]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:61; Berlin and Barlow 1980:61. Although Torquemada (197583, 1:28789 [chap. 76]) places the conquest of the Iztecs and Itzcuintepecas with the earlier, initial thrust into the Huaxyacac area, the only other dated source, the Anales de Cuauhtitlan (1975:61), convincingly places them later. Since this campaign is the most geographically appropriate for this conquests, I include them here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67. Torquemada 197583, 1:296 [bk. 2, chap. 79]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68. Muñoz Camargo 1892:126; Torquemada 197583, 1:301302 [bk. 2, chap. 82]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:61; Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3], 233 [relación 7]; Dibble 1981, 1:43; Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:188 [chap. 75]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70. Crónica mexicana 1975:658 [chap. 51]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71. Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:19092 [chap. 76]; Sahagún 1954:10; Torquemada 197583, 1:303 [bk. 2, chap. 83]. The accounts of Durán (1967, 2:47384 [chaps. 6465]) and the Crónica mexicana (1975:65861 [chap. 51]), both of which stem from the common Crónica X source, are at variance with other accounts over who Nezahualpilli's successor was and how the succession occurred, and they are apparently unreliable on this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72. Chimalpahin 1965:233 [relación 7]; Durán 1967, 2:45962 [chap. 61]; Mengin 1952:458; Torquemada 197583, 1:31112 [bk. 2, chap. 87]. Tlatlauhqui-Tepec is recorded as having been conquered at the same time or slightly earlier (Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3], 233 [relación 7]). The relative proximity of Tlatlauhqui-Tepec to Tlaxcallan argues in favor of a connection between this conquest and that. However, such a conjunction in a xochiyaoyotl is unusual. If they were not conquered as part of the same campaign, there are two alternative explanations. First, there were two entirely separate campaigns, one against Tlatlauhqui-Tepec and another against Tlaxcallan; second, Tlatlauhqui-Tepec is an error. The Anales de Tlatelolco (Berlin and Barlow 1980:17) does list Tlatlauhqui-Tepec as an undated conquest, supporting the correctness of the Chimalpahin reading. |
|
|
|
|
|