The Economist has an article on the idea of a World Currency:
http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/current/index_fn7485.html
An excerpt:
The usual way to ask whether countries would be better off=20
sharing a single currency=97that is, whether they constitute an=20
=93optimal currency area=94=97is to examine the following trade-off.
On one side is the undoubted convenience of a single money as=20
a lubricant for trade and cross-border investment. On the other
is the loss of the exchange rate as a shock-absorber for times=20
when one or more of the countries face pressures (an abrupt=20
fall in demand for their exports, say, or a sudden rise in=20
labour costs) that the others are spared=97a so-called
=93asymmetric shock=94.=20
Robin Hanson =20
hanson@econ.berkeley.edu http://hanson.berkeley.edu/ =20
RWJF Health Policy Scholar, Sch. of Public Health 510-643-1884 =20
140 Warren Hall, UC Berkeley, CA 94720-7360 FAX: 510-643-8614
[To drop AltInst, tell: majordomo@cco.caltech.edu to: unsubscribe altinst]
Received on Tue Sep 29 20:29:23 1998
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:49:12 PST