john@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za (John Carter) writes:
>If the state believes an asset is undervalued on a form by more than
>50% and can prove it by publically finding a buyer at twice the stated
>value, the state can repossess that asset and sell it to that
>buyer. The stated value goes to the owner, and the rest goes to the
>state.
That would make it pretty tricky to rely on property whose value is rising
rapidly. For instance, here in Silicon Valley I gather it hasn't been unusual
for people who are putting their houses on the market to underestimate its
market price by 20 or 30%. Imagine how easy it would be for a busy person
who didn't want to sell her house to overlook the need to get a new appraisal
every few months in years when the housing market heats up.
>You needn't list every desk and chair own by every company you have
>shares in, merely the company and the percent share and the
>value. Each company must list its assets in some sensible and public
>fashion.
Do I have to list every book I own? Every photo I've taken? The obvious
answers to this kind of question either create lots of paperwork (and
some privacy objections) or create some clear-cut loopholes which impair
the apparent fairness of your proposal.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter McCluskey | Critmail (http://crit.org/critmail.html): http://www.rahul.net/pcm | Accept nothing less to archive your mailing list [To drop AltInst, tell: majordomo@cco.caltech.edu to: unsubscribe altinst]Received on Mon Jun 29 07:40:15 1998
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:49:12 PST