poly: Robin's peer review

From: Robin Hanson <hanson@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu Dec 04 1997 - 13:47:46 PST


My idea was to have two lists, both open for anyone to read, but one with
a closed list of people who can post to it. I suggested using peer review:
decisions would be made by juries of 3 randomly selected closed list members.
Regarding admission: Open list members who wanted admission would submit
some of their posts to the open list. Regarding deletion, a closed list
member could submit another member's post to the closed list.

An alternative is for you to just manage a closed list by hand, deciding
for yourself who to include or not. Probably just as effective, but more
work for you.


Received on Thu Dec 4 13:47:55 1997

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:45:29 PST