|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
64. Díaz del Castillo 190816, 1:22 [bk. 1, chap. 3], 1:42 [bk. 1, chap. 9], 1:118 [bk. 2, chap. 34]; Durán 1967, 2:167 [chap. 19]; López de Gómara 196566, 2:102; Muñoz Camargo 1892:14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65. López de Velasco 1971:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66. Sahagún 1954:76. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67. Clark 1938,1:93; Sahagún 1952:54. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68. Durán 1967,1:114 [chap. 11]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69. Durán 1967,1:6768 [chap. 6]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70. Zorita 1971:93. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71. Sahagún 1954:52. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72. Sahagún 1951:45, 1957:26, 1970:15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73. Sahagún 1954:5152. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74. Durán 1967, 2:209 [chap. 25]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75. Sahagún 1954:74. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76. Sahagún 1959:92. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77. Sahagún 1959:5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78. Sahagún 1959:56. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79. Sahagún 1959:6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80. Nuttall 1891b:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81. McAfee and Barlow 1946:196. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82. Chimalpahin 1965:220 [relación 7]; Crónica mexicana 1975:553 [chap. 78], 599 [chap. 88]. The Crónica mexicana lists Ahuitzotl's insignia as the cuauhxolotl. (See fig. 15 for a picture of the cuauhxolotl warrior's suit.) What this represents is unclear: the word is not listed in Molina (1970) or Siméon (1981). If it is correct as spelled, the word should mean "Xolotl [double or servant] associated with trees [or wood] or eagles." It is possible, though unlikely, that it may have been an error for cuauhxilot, which is a tree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83. Torquemada 197583, 4:329 [bk. 14, chap. 5]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84. Torquemada 197583, 1:25354 [bk. 2, chap. 6]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85. Durán 1967, 2:46062 [chap. 61]; Sahagún 1954:88. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86. Acosta 1604, 2:316. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87. Although I am not in total agreement, for further consideration of the structure of the Aztec military see Davies 1972; Monjarás-Ruiz 1976; Orozco y Berra 1978, 1:206208; Piho 1972a, 1974; Stenzel 1976. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88. Hernández 1946:23 [bk. 1, chap. 23]; Mendieta 1971:124. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89. Sahagún 1952:5354. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90. Katz 1974:148; Velasco Piña 1979. The office of cihuacoatl was prominent only during its occupancy by Tlacaelel. This has been interpreted either as the result of Tlacaelel's personal qualities, elevated the otherwise less important office, or as an overstatement of Tlacaelel's significance by later chroniclers, who exalted their own ancestors (Davies 1974:66; 1980:21). However, Carrasco (1984b) offers a significant argument for the importance of Tlacaelel based on his position in the Aztec succession hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91. Códice Ramírez 1975:5758; Crónica mexicana 1975:268 [chap. 15]. |
|
|
|
|
|