"Unemployment Insurance Savings Accounts"
BY: MARTIN S. FELDSTEIN
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Harvard University
DANIEL ALTMAN
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Paper ID: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.
6860
Date: December 1998
Contact: MARTIN S. FELDSTEIN
Email: Mailto:feldstein@nber.org
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Phone: (617)868-3905
Fax: (617)868-7194
Co-Auth: DANIEL ALTMAN
Email: Mailto:altman@nber.org
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Paper Requests:
Full-Text Availability at http://www.nber.org/wwp.html Papers
can be downloaded online for $5. Hard copies are $10 plus
$10.00/order outside the USA. Prepayment required. NBER orders:
Mailto:orders@nber.org Checks, Mastercard, Visa and American
Express to 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138.
Phone:(617)868-3900. Fax:(617)349-3955. For NBER Subscriptions
Mailto:subs@nber.org or write to "Subscriptions" at address
above.
ABSTRACT:
We examine a system of Unemployment Insurance Saving Accounts
(UISAs) as an alternative to the traditional unemployment
insurance system. Individuals are required to save up to 4
percent of wages in special accounts and to draw unemployment
compensation from these accounts instead of taking state
unemployment insurance benefits. If the accounts are exhausted,
the government lends money to the account. Positive accounts
earn the return on commercial paper and negative accounts are
charged that rate. Positive UISA balances are converted into
retirement income or bequeathed if the individual dies before
retirement age. Negative account balances are forgiven at
retirement age.
Money taken by an unemployed individual from a UISA with a
positive balance reduces the individual's personal wealth by an
equal amount. In this case, individuals fully internalize the
cost of unemployment compensation. UISAs provide the same
protection to the unemployed as the current UI system but with
less of the adverse incentives.
The key empirical question is whether accounts based on a
moderate saving rate can finance a significant share of
unemployment payments or whether the concentration of
unemployment among a relatively small number of individuals
implies that the UISA balances would typically be negative,
forcing individuals to rely on government benefits with the same
adverse effects that characterize the current UI system.
To resolve this issue we use the Panel Study on Income Dynamics
to simulate the UISA system over a 25 year historic period. Our
analysis indicates that almost all individuals have positive
UISA balances and therefore remain sensitive to the cost of
unemployment compensation. Even among individuals who experience
unemployment, most have positive account balances at the end of
their unemployment spell. Although about half of the benefit
dollars would go to individuals whose accounts are negative at
the end of their working life, less than one third of the
benefits go to individuals who also have negative account
balances when unemployed. These facts suggests a substantial
potential improvement in the incentives of the unemployed.
The cost to taxpayers of forgiving the negative balances is
substantially less than half of the taxpayer cost of the current
UI system.
Our analysis of the distribution of lifetime UISA payments and
taxes of household heads shows the top quintile gaining a small
cumulative amount while those in the bottom quintile lose a very
small cumulative amount. Other quintiles are small net gainers.
JEL Classification: H5, J65
Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
[To drop AltInst, tell: majordomo@cco.caltech.edu to: unsubscribe altinst]
Received on Wed Nov 22 15:24:26 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:49:12 PST