Re: AltInst: Means of production.

This is a kind of total asset "Georgism" (a la Henry George and the single
taxers).

The problem is that the real assets today are intangible "mindware" rather
than physical stuff. You can redistribute stuff, but how do redistribute
knowledge, intelligence, and intellectual skills? If you redistribute the
value added created by mindware, then how do you get them to continue to
produce?

George L. O'Brien

At 11:57 AM 6/23/98 -0700, you wrote:
>One phrase has always stuck in my mind, "the people must have access
>to the means of production". (Anyone know the original source? A
>search on the 'net churns up 14 pages of hits. I suspect the Communist
>Manifesto is the most popular source, but I'm know the anarchists
>predate old Marx on this.)
>
>And now we are here in the new South Africa and that hope is nowhere
>near implemented...
>
>Why? Private ownership. The means of production is privately owned,
>and the vast majority of assets are owned by a tiny minority.
>
>Sound familiar? This is certainly not uniquely South African.
>
>Do we then go Marxist and say the answer is to place it in the hands
>of the State? Nah! The time of the marxists vs the capitalists
>bunfight is over and both have lost. (Ok, so you don't believe the
>capitalists lost? Well, this post fights a different battle, so I
>won't get into that flamewar. I just ask you to speak to more bods
>from Africa or the old Eastern blok who have seen both and like
>neither.)
>
>What is needed is the following program :-
>
>1) All assets must be owned by and accounted to real people, not legal
>entities such as companies. Your income tax return must include a
>complete listing of your assets and an estimate of the current
>monetary value of those assets.
>
>Ownership of any assets that do not appear on anyones tax form will
>revert to the state. Such assets must be publically auctioned.
>
>If the state believes an asset is undervalued on a form by more than
>50% and can prove it by publically finding a buyer at twice the stated
>value, the state can repossess that asset and sell it to that
>buyer. The stated value goes to the owner, and the rest goes to the
>state.
>
>Conversely, your tax will be levied in proportion to your total
>assets, (ie. gross over estimation of ones assets is also punished.)
>
>It is OK to have partial ownership of an asset. eg. Assets accounted
>to a company, but you list a certain percentage ownership of a
>company.
>
>2) The total assets of all citizens in the country is called the Gross
> National Assets (GNA). The Per Capita Assets (PCA) is the total
> assets of the country (GNA) divided by the number of people in the
> country. The PCA is simply the average assets of the people.
>
>3) If any individual owns more than X times the PCA, all assets over
> and above X * PCA will revert to the state and be sold by public
> auction. X is an adjustable parameter allowing for pensions and a
> bit of ambition / greed. X could be as high as 50.
>
> Of course, nobody will allow the state to grab their assets and
> will "gift" family and friends with those assets to keep their
> personal wealth below X * PCA.
>
> The flip side being that those "gifts" are true gifts and those
> friends and family will then be legally entitled to dispose of
> those assets and the produce of those assets as they see
> fit. (ie. Any contract binding the use or disposal of those gifts
> would be taken as evidence that the asset was not accounted to the
> correct persons form, and the asset will be revert to the state.)
>
>This would create an equitable and acceptable redistribution of
>wealth, where the redistribution is performed with far less acrimony
>than other schemes. (Wives of big execs will just _love_ this scheme.
>(Who cares about the mays and maybes of alimony when you can get
>ownership?))
>
>In South Africa particularly there are assets held fallow by near
>monopolies / cartels to artificially decrease availability and hence
>increase prices. This scheme will break up such things better than any
>red tape bound monopolies commission. The most infamous historically
>being the De Beers diamond cartel.
>
>The value of an asset is strongly correlated to the production
>potential of the asset. Fallow assets = wasted production potential =
>unemployment = poverty.
>
>In South Africa tax is mostly derived from personal income
>tax. Companies are taxed on their profits and some how, magically, our
>companies always have so many arcane expenses that they hardly ever
>make a profit... As ever, the net of state is a wondrous thing, it
>catches all the little fish and lets the big ones slip through...
>
>A tax based on assets rather than income will readjust that
>balance. Indeed, instead of the inflexible X * PCA limit, estimate
>what is the mean productivity of the assets and have a sliding scale
>of assets tax that makes it, on average, unprofitable to have more
>that X * PCA assets.
>
>How to police the reporting of assets? Make all the information
>publically available and grant a "finders fee" of 20% of whatever the
>state gains.
>
>You needn't list every desk and chair own by every company you have
>shares in, merely the company and the percent share and the
>value. Each company must list its assets in some sensible and public
>fashion.
>
>
>
>John Carter EMail: ece@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za
>Telephone : 27-12-808-0374x194 Fax:- 27-12-808-0338
><http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947> or <http://iwqs.pwv.gov.za>
>
>There is ever only one enemy - And that is the military.
>It matters not on which side they purport to be.
>
>
>[To drop AltInst, tell: majordomo@cco.caltech.edu to: unsubscribe altinst]
>
>

[To drop AltInst, tell: majordomo@cco.caltech.edu to: unsubscribe altinst]
Received on Tue Jun 23 23:11:36 1998