Curt Adams wrote:
> >It occurs to me that a common theme in many dreams of the future we have
> >been enticed by is an unusual degree of autonomy.
>
>I don't think "autonomy", which means self-government, is quite the right
>word for what you're discussing.
Fair enough.
>Certainly the current trend is for greater interdependence. If anything,
>the cutting-edge technologies that are looked on as the vanguard of
>nanotech (computers, software, biotech) are interdependent in the extreme.
>Individuals choose not to make substitutes for existing devices, but to
>devise new ones and then trade to get the ones they don't make. I see
>no profound reason that our approach to general-purpose manufacturing
>(i.e. nanotech) would differ greatly from our approach to general-purpose
>computing.
So what would you conclude from this about the likelihood of seeing
personal nano-factories producing personal goods from standard molecules?
Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
Received on Fri Aug 27 11:12:30 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:45:30 PST