From: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>

Date: Sun Apr 26 1998 - 14:35:13 PDT

Date: Sun Apr 26 1998 - 14:35:13 PDT

Nick Bostrom, <bostrom@ndirect.co.uk>, writes:

*> Depending on which sense of probability we have in mind, we might
*

*> give very different numerical estimates. Consider the question: "What
*

*> is the probability that nanotechnology will cause the extinction of
*

*> earth-descendent intelligent life?"
*

*> [...]
*

*> In sense 2, I might say: "I don't know, but I would guess somewhere
*

*> between 2% and 70%."
*

When dealing with an uncertain event, is there any more information to

give once you have specified your best guess at the probability? Given

the question above, where you are uncertain between 2% and 70%, suppose

that if you were forced to pin it down you would say 25%.

Is there a difference between situations where you are "certain" the

chance is 25%, and situations where you are uncertain, but the best

guess is 25%?

To describe the chances of a future event, does probability need

error bars? Should we have to draw a normal-shaped curve showing the

probability that we think a certain probability is correct? (And if so,

does it stop there, or do we need to further qualify the probability

that we give to the probabilities?)

This question has come up on the FX (idea futures) game, where people

are betting on the probability of future events. Is it significant

whether there is a strong market consensus that a certain probability

is about right, versus a claim where there is a broader range of

values which have support?

Hal

Received on Sun Apr 26 21:40:49 1998

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:45:30 PST
*