poly: Polymath list invitation

From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed Dec 03 1997 - 06:51:37 PST

[Feel free to submit this to the list after I've been added; although
it was initially merely an acceptance of your invitation, it has
turned into something else.]

Thank you for the invitation. I accept; the list looks like people
who (even in a small subset) I may wish to communicate with.

I must admit to being a big believer in the selection mechanisms of a
single judgemental (but usually right) individual over the selection
mechanisms of a large crowd averaging its preferences. Of course, the
preferences of an individual selected at random rarely coincide with
my own. However, the selected preferences of some selected individuals
coincide with my own far, far better than those of a random crowd.

Decor selected by an individual with "taste" is far better than
randomly selected decor. In general, parties with well selected sets
of guests are far more frequently the ones I wish to attend than those
with self-selected guests. I strongly suspect that a list with
selected membership will be more interesting (at least for a time)
than one with a self-selected membership.

My one concern in all such things is, however, that fresh ideas tend
to come from fresh individuals. After a while, doubtless the
"polymath" list will become stale. However, I've ceased to be upset by
such things. A good dinner party has a beginning, middle and end --
one is rarely upset by the fact that it cannot go on forever. A good
book has a finish, too -- without an ending, one has soap
opera. Periodically, one must accept that a discussion clique, mailing
list, news group, or other discussion forum has outlived its
usefulness, and create a new one. I hope that this one is interesting
and provocative in its lifetime, and I'm happy to be here at the start
so I get to watch all the good bits.

Received on Thu Dec 4 13:45:45 1997

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 14:45:29 PST