Add
a comment about this subject.
From Kirkus Reviews, 06/01/97:
This luxuriant retelling of the story of the Beauty and the Beast is very
different from McKinley's own Beauty (1978). While sticking to the
tale's traditional outlines, this version by turns rushes headlong and
slows to a stately pace, is full of asides and surprises, and is suffused
with obsession for the rose and thorn as flora, metaphor, and symbol.
Beauty can make anything grow, especially roses; her memories of her
dead mother are always accompanied by her mother's elusive rose
scent. The Beast's aroma is also of roses, as is the scent of a sorcerer
and a greenwitch. Eroticism, comfort, hard work, and the heart's deep
love are all bound in rose imagery, from the curtains and tapestries of
the Beast's palace to the Rose Cottage home of Beauty's family. Roses
stand for all the many different facets of love (the text is specific on
that): Beauty's for her father and her vividly etched sisters Lionheart
and Jeweltongue; for a family hearth and safe home; for a puppy
named Tea-cosy; and most incredibly but satisfyingly, for the Beast
who has haunted her nightmares since childhood. While the story is full
of silvery images and quotable lines, it will strike some as overlong and
overblown; for others, perhaps those who were bewitched by Donna
Jo Napoli's Zel (1996), it is surely the perfect book. (Fiction. 12+) --
Copyright ©1997, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.
From: Cheryl K
ROSE DAUGHTER Review
I filched this from the Amazon.com Rose Daughter page. (Still no definite ordering date--has anyone heard anything yet? The page says Sept. 1, 1997, as publication date. Does this mean printing, or shipping, or arrival in bookstores, or are most books out before their publication date? Anyone? I'm afraid I'll have to be at Borders in Kansas City when it opens at 9 a.m. on Sept. 1--which actually sounds rather fun.) This is the Kirkus review, published last June. I've tried to post it before, to About the Author, but apparently that section of the discussion pages isn't working. Anyway, here you are:
CEBEK@aol.com
Wednesday, July 16, 1997 at 23:45:30 (EDT)