|
 |
|
|
|
|
51. Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:80 [bk. 11, chap. 145], 4:151 [bk. 12, chap. 152]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
52. Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:15657 [bk. 12, chap. 153]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
53. Cortés 1971:209 [letter 3]; Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:165 [bk. 12, chap. 150]; Gardiner 1956. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
54. Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:161 [bk. 12, chap. 153]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
55. Cortés 1971:24243 [letter 3]; Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:169 [bk. 12, chap. 155]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
56. Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:16970 [bk. 12, chap. 155]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
57. Aguilar 1963:160; Cortés 1971:264 [letter 3]; Díaz del Castillo 190816, 4:183 [bk. 12, chap. 156]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
1. For example, in a xochiyaoyotl with Huexotzinco, Atlixco, and Cholollan, the Triple Alliance sent an army of 100,000 men. The army gathered at Atzitzihuacan, a subject of Papayocan, but the battle began with only 200 Aztec warriors, and the units fought sequentially; the Tetzcocas first, then the people of Tlacopan, then the Aztecs (Durán 1967, 2:434 [chap. 57]). |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
2. For example, the relative lack of wealth in Metztitlan was attributed to the fact that they fought against the Aztecs (Colección de documentos inéditos ... de América 186484, 4:454). |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
3. Chimalpahin 1965:204 [relación 7]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
4. Torquemada 197583, 1:287 [bk. 2, chap. 75]. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
5. Towns where local tlahtohqueh were replaced by Aztec governors but which were not mentioned in chronicle accounts of conquests include Coatepec (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:52), Tepechpan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:234), Tlacotepec (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:123), Tetellan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:134), Quetzallan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:140), Apaztlan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:143), Tlachco (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 6:276), Miahuatlan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 4:127), Coatlan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 4:133), Tlacotlalpan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 5:2), Piaztlan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 5: 78), Texallocan (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 5:87), and Temazcaltepec (Paso y Troncoso 190548, 7:21). |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
6. Armillas 1951:80; Gorenstein 1966:53; Palerm 1956:194. However, fortifications have been widely reported in Mesoamerica, but not just in the postclassic (Armillas 194244, 1948, 1951; Davies 1972; Gorenstein 1966, 1973; Palerm 1956; D. Peterson 1974). |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
7. Palerm 1956:194. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
8. De la Croix 1972; Finer 1975. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
9. Palerm 1956:19495. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
10. Luttwak 1976:6166. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
11. When this reorganization of the tribute system took place is uncertain. The format of the Matrícula de tributos (1980) is not prehispanic, and it may have been compiled after the Spanish conquest (Berdan 1980a:9; Robertson 1959: 7277), but it indicates that the reorganization may have occurred as early as 151112, after the widespread revolts following the as- |
|
|
|
|
|