|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Crónica mexicana 1975:61420 [chaps. 9293]; Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:179 [chap. 71]; Mengin 1952:457; Torquemada 197583, 1:287 [chap. 75]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36. Crónica mexicana 1975:606608 [chaps. 9091]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37. Crónica mexicana 1975:606608 [chaps. 9091]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:67; Berlin and Barlow 1980:1718; Clark 1938, 1:41; Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:180 [chap. 71]; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119; Torquemada 197583, 1:285 [bk. 2, chap. 75]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:68; Berlin and Barlow 1980:18; Clark 1938, 1:41; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119; Torquemada 197583, 1:288 [bk. 2, chap. 76]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40. Berlin and Barlow 1980:61; Chimalpahin 1965:120 [relación 3], 22829 [relación 7]; Crónica mexicana 1975:63435 [chap. 96]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41. Of the captives taken, the Aztecs took 400 prisoners; Chalco 200; Coatlalpan, lowland towns, and Chinampan 200; Coatlalpan 140; Matlatzinco 180; Colhuacan, Huitzilopochco, Ixtlapalapan, and Mexicatzinco 120; Acolhuacan 800; Tlalhuacpan 300; the raw recruits another 200; and the new tequihuahqueh 260 (Crónica mexicana 1975:63436 [chaps. 9697]; Durán 1967, 2:43940 [chap. 58]). Colhuacan, Huitzilopochco, Ixtlapalapan, and Mexicaltzinco were not mentioned explicitly. Rather, the reference was to Nauhteuctli, which refers collectively to those four tlahtohqueh (Gerhard 1972:178). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42. This has been interpreted as referring to ''Totontepcc" because of its location (Davies 1968:199200) and based on the assumption that there were two campaigns. If these two are merged into a single one, Tototepec's proximity to Huauhtlan is less compelling, and the more obvious Tototepec can be considered as a conquest because of the inclusion of Teuctepec and Tzollan. Presumably, Tecozauhtepec (unidentified, but probably in present-day northern Oaxaca near the other towns listed as conquered during this campaign) was also conquered, as captives from Tzotzollan, Teuctepec, and Tecozauhtepec were sacrificed during the New Fire Ceremony (Chimalpahin 1965:229 [relación 7]; Durán 1967, 2:454 [chap. 60]). Other likely candidates for this campaign include Tzollan and Mictlan, although the sources are not consistent of the dating or sequence of these conquests (Códice Telleriano-Remensis 196465:308; Torquemada 197583, 1:290 [bk. 2, chap. 76]). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43. Anales de Cuauhtitlan 1975:67; Berlin and Barlow 1980:1718, 61; Clark 1938, 1:41; Paso y Troncoso 193942, 10:119; Sahagún 1954:3; Torquemada 197583, 290 [bk. 2, chap. 76], 312 [bk. 2, chap. 87]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44. Much of this campaign took place along traditional conquest routes into the Huaxyacac region as far as Mictlan. From there thrusts were made both east to Quetzaltepec and southwest along valleys as far as Teuctepec and Tototepec. The return was probably along another established conquest route. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45. Crónica mexicana 1975:62325 [chap. 94]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46. Ixtlilxóchitl 197577, 2:179 [chap. 71]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47. Torquemada 197583, 1:290 [bk. 2, chap. 76]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48. Clark 1938, 1:41. |
|
|
|
|
|