Re: poly: The singleton hypothesis

Carl Feynman <carlf@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> Of course, I may be wrong, and progress may be endless. It would be more
> fun that way, but it doesn't seem likely.

It is interesting (but perhaps rather pointless) to ponder how the
natural laws would have to be to allow that. Some kind of infinite
series of ever subtler interactions and fields with constantly new
and unexpected properties?

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y